主題 | 名稱 | 說明 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
輔導群 | 102年度「有多補差成」分組實作單 |
|||||
103學年度辦理推動主軸工作坊的實作單 |
||||||
104學年度議題融入教學實作單 |
||||||
大家在教字母時一定有這個經驗:在現有字型中找不到完全對應的字型。因此國內教師製作字母學習單,只能以兩三種字型混用,或手寫加畫格線,難以在電腦中完稿,造成教學資源製作與分享的不便。EngTRESS字型的產生便是為了解決國內字母教學問題。 |
||||||
基隆市 | ||||||
新北市 | 103學年度新北市研習資料 |
|||||
fun with games |
||||||
project-based learning strategy |
||||||
英輔團與外師合作成果 |
||||||
國際教育推動與課程設計 |
||||||
課堂教學研究方案 |
||||||
新北市國中英語教師臉書翰林版備課平台 |
||||||
新北市國中英語教師臉書康軒版備課平台 |
||||||
新北市國中英語教師臉書南一版共備平台 |
||||||
英語電子期刊 |
||||||
佳林國中外師Corey Sanderson與中英團團員淡水國中陸韻萍的協同教學教案--Superlatives |
||||||
主題 4 | ||||||
主題 5 | ||||||
講師:政治大學 英國語文學系 葉潔宇教授 |
||||||
講師:彰化師範大學英語系 游毓玲教授 1.Differentiated instruction |
||||||
主題 6 | ||||||
新竹縣101年英語免費線上資源簡介 |
||||||
TBLT-合作備課平台 |
||||||
新竹市 | ||||||
工作坊(I) 專題講座:新竹市立三民國中退休教師傅惠美老師分享 (0331Cooperative learning.pptx) 工作坊 (III) 輔導團教學經驗分享:新竹市立三民國中潘慧嵐、羅麗月、周鳳琪老師分享 (103.4.28 輔導團合作學習實作經驗分享_1.ppt, B3 U7 worksheet.docx, Some ways of teaching reading0430.docx) |
||||||
英語課堂中的閱讀策略 |
||||||
主題 8 | ||||||
http://9years.mlc.edu.tw/9yearsFiles/9years/3430/國中小英語銜接大湖國小20120330_revised.ppt |
||||||
三灣國中英語金頭腦: 簡單的教學問與答的活動,透過ppt及多媒體的運用,讓教室的氣份更活潑有趣。 |
||||||
精進國中小教學簡報-台師大張素真教授 |
||||||
臺中市 | Due to this national policy of promoting Cooperative Learning throughout all the junior high schools in the country, I get to travel to many schools to not only share what I've learned related to this teaching approach but observe other teachers' classes and give my professional feedback and suggestions. When it comes to classroom observation, I probably have done this over twenty times, gaining plenty of experience and STEALING many brilliant ideas from it as well. So, I've developed my own framework of participation and discussion in terms of Cooperative Learning, jotting down everything, including the highlights, my questions and suggestions, to share with all the participants right after the teaching demonstration. Before Demonstration I'll tell the event planner that I'm really willing to help check the teacher's lesson plan prior to the real performance if that's fine with him or her. Of course, this is not mandatory, but if I do get one, I'll carefully examine it with the following features which would help a lot to clarify some doubts: objectives, activities, assessment, materials, and time distribution. Lesson plans can come in a variety of forms and formats, but I always keep those five key elements in mind and raise some questions for discussion according to the lesson plan. Take this one for example: "1.每一個教學流程若再思考所欲達成的目標為何(何種閱讀策略)?以及如何得知達到目標(評量方式)?如此,加上原本的時間分配後就會是一完整的教案,且有利於議課時的說明。 2.流程一中提到翻譯、排序及「討論文章內容」,請問討論文章內容指的是? 3.程度好設計問題,程度不好畫圖,此為差異化教學概念。一般的差異化教學會將學生依程度分為高、中、低三組,老師可想想程度中等的同學可針對閱讀做什麼? 4.不知學生之前有無做過類似畫圖的活動?若無,老師可在活動前提供一範例,學生在討論期間會較有具體概念須要完成什麼。 5.程度不好的同學須於畫圖活動完成後緊接著由程度好同學教導如何正確念出題目。因接下來還會有二組須上台報告所完成的圖,不知學生在何時可準備如何報告? 6.建議當天可將教案、學習單及所上課的課文內容等影印裝訂後給前來觀課的老師們。 7.建議老師可思考此次公開課經驗如何融入教甄的教學演示?例如如何以全英語說明在活動前、中、後的指導語及回饋等。在口試部分,若抽到的題目為「如何因應會考挑戰」、「英語閱讀教學」、「差異化教學」、 「分組合作學習」、「補救教學」等相關教學實務問題,如何以全英語回答。 其實您最瞭解班上學生,且觀課及議課是蠻主觀的,所以您可擷取上述適合自己班上、適合自己教學風格的部分再加以思考。" The above is a recent example of how I discussed the lesson plan with the presenter in advance. As you can see, being judgmental is absolutely something I want to avoid no matter what. So, I'll reiterate that it's perfectly okay with me if they decide to stick with the original plan. After all, I don't want to jump into conclusion based on only the lesson plan. During Demonstration A lot of things are going on in my head when sitting in the back of the classroom. I need to be completely focused and well prepared for my job as an adviser: 1. A quick summary of the teaching procedures. This would indicate that I am preoccupied with everything in the classroom later in the meeting. I'll specifically pay attention to the seating, grouping, rewarding system, positive interdependence, individual accountability, equal participation and so on of the whole process of demonstration. 2. Strengths of the demonstration. I always bring up the strengths first before providing the rest of my opinion. For example, I usually compliment the teacher's attempt of giving activity instructions in English, being skilled at handling the CALL equipment, using intriguing board games and authentic learning materials, complete with students' active participation, to name just a few. 3. Questions regarding the demonstration. Coming up with good thought-provoking questions is an art. Again, I've met some professors and teachers who appeared quite authoritative and overbearing. They thought they could just judge a teacher with only one class observation, not to mention that they know nothing about both the students and the teacher at all. I don't want to be a jerk like that. 4. Suggestions. This is absolutely my favorite part. Based on what the teacher presented, I'd look for similar activities I've done in my own class for their future reference. The more I try out new stuff in my class, the more I can offer my advice as an alternative to the original one. Currently, I often share activities with regard to reading strategies, fun grammar application and how to get students to speak in English. After Presentation A meeting will be called right after the demonstration, and that's when everybody looks forward to hearing what you have to say as a so-called “expert” on this field of Cooperative Learning. 1. Expressing gratitude towards the demonstrator and the event planner. I know how challenging, sometimes even intimidating, it can be for a teacher to publicly teach in front of others. Also, I would like to set the tone first that we're not here today to judge; instead, we're here to learn from each other. 2. Quickly going over what is in my notes. This includes a brief summary of the class, the highlights of the demonstration and my questions about the teaching. 3. Inviting the demonstrator to reflect on his or her own teaching today. If they need to do it one more time, what would they do to make it better? 4. Asking the participants to give their feedback. This is where I can learn about whether I've missed on something important and also what other features that they value most. 5. The Q and A session. Frequently asked questions include: "Would this student-centered approach help with the grades?", "Would it slow down my schedule?", "Would I be able to cover everything before the exams?", "The preparation seems very time-consuming, how do I make time for it?", "What if my students are getting very noisy in my class?". 6. Providing nuggets to take away. This is when this teaching blog comes in handy because I can immediately show off my lesson plans, pictures, video clips, activities, students' feedback and so on with the participants. This job of mine is really challenging and rewarding. I really picked up many great teaching ideas from those teaching demonstrations. On top of that, in order to provide the nuggets, I am also propelled to relentlessly take what I learned into practice in my own class. To sum up, taking part in the class participation and discussion is totally a virtuous cycle to me because it satisfies my cravings for learning as well as sharing. On top of that, what really matters is that I can contribute to promoting this teaching approach and thus benefit some teachers out there. |
|||||
Richard's Presentations |
||||||
原臺中市國教輔導團國小組英語教學領域輔導小組精進教學工作計畫執行成果 |
||||||
原臺中市國教輔導團國小組英語教學領域輔導小組精進教學工作計畫實施成果 |
||||||
原臺中市國教輔導團國小組英語教學領域輔導小組精進教學工作計畫實施成果 |
||||||
原臺中市國教輔導團國小組英語學習領域輔導員勤耕作品(教學研究心得點滴),與大家分享分享 |
||||||
主題 10 | EZ半線英語創意教學工作坊 |
|||||
南投縣 | ||||||
在FB上體驗翻轉教師Teacher Tracy的翻轉教學點滴 |
||||||
以共備共學模式進行閱讀理解策略教學 |
||||||
主題 12 | 雲林縣國教輔導團 |
|||||
新址 崇德國中內 |
||||||
主題 13 | ||||||
共備共學教案 |
||||||
桌由融入教學 |
||||||
嘉義市 | 104年桌遊融入英語教學-觀課、議課檔案 |
|||||
音訊媒體製作教學 |
||||||
蘭潭國中輔導員辜郁恬教學成果分享報告 |
||||||
|
||||||
讀者劇場(Reader’s Theater) Live Show! |
||||||
嘉市文教82期-國小階段的英語學習內容與課堂教學策略 |
||||||
98敦煌特刊扭蛋讓英語學習更有趣 |
||||||
嘉市文教83-國小英語課室班級經營 |
||||||
讀者劇場(Reader's Theater) Live Show! |
||||||
當戲劇遇上閱讀-台南大學張麗玉教授 |
||||||
行動學習-中正大學陳玟君教授 |
||||||
新竹市建功高中丘吉富老師-Engma English+ Drama= Engma! |
||||||
臺南市 | ||||||
The use of concordancer could be useful in teachers' professional development. |
||||||
教學影片剪輯在英語教學的運用 |
||||||
高雄市 | ||||||
由高雄市國教輔導團英語輔導小組所建立的FB粉絲團,提供教學策略。 |
||||||
與高雄市各校英語領域召集人,分享104年「國民中小學英語教師專業發展增能工作坊」研習內容 |
||||||
舉辦「桌遊融入英語教學策略」教學專業研習,由文藻外語大學英語系講師葉采旻分享好用臉書社群 |
||||||
屏東縣 | 適用期末review |
|||||
theme-based resources |
||||||
Mind Mapping心智圖運用在英語教學 |
||||||
1050318跨區聯盟的分享PPT |
||||||
運用翻轉學習於補救班級的實務策略 |
||||||
教室裡的春天 |
||||||
宜蘭縣 | 字母教學策略網路資源匯整 |
|||||
字彙教學策略網路資源匯整 |
||||||
西洋歌曲英語教學策略網路資源匯整 |
||||||
RT讀者劇場教學策略: 研習成果與網路資源匯整 |
||||||
宜蘭英語島 |
||||||
輔導團影音 |
||||||
ETA Fulbright 外師上課實況 |
||||||
教學訪視上課實況 |
||||||
增能研習實況 |
||||||
國中英語島 |
||||||
師資:[中小幼師]李壹明,[中小幼師]黃素娟 時間:105. 12.1 (四) 下午13:30 ~ 16:30 |
||||||
花蓮縣 | ||||||
1. The Magic World- 鄭琡金老師 2. What Color Is It?-陳世玟老師 3. 多元化學習,英語校園- 謝佳媛老師 4. 英語繪本小書製作-林欣怡、宋依潔老師 |
||||||
臺東縣英語「契作」團 | RT研習辦理 |
|||||
games |
||||||
主題 21 | 全英工作坊產出教材 |
|||||
Rod Harvey |
||||||
主題 23 | 一、原來英語可以這樣說!-英語演說訓練技巧分享 |